7 Signs you are Failing at Scrum

7 Signs that you are failing at Scrum

See below some key indicators that you are not implementing scrum at its highest efficiency:

1 — You Have Abandoned the Sprint Retrospective

Your scrum team are no longer performing the Sprint Retrospective. This means your team are no longer focusing on continuous improvement of have any kind of plan in place to speed up delivery time.

2 — User Stories Aren’t Finished on Time

Teams are never able to deliver user stories by the end of the Sprint, and by default are always going into the next sprint.

3 — Sprint Reviews are Self-Congratulary

Your sprint reviews are no longer conducted with the whole team or key stakeholders, in fact the meeting has now become a self-congratulatory meeting because there are no impartial outsiders attending.

4 — Spring Planning is Chaotic

When you perform sprint planning, its chaos. They are painful because teams are not engaged to get ready for the next sprint

5 — Sprint Planning is Short

Sprint plannings are shortened ‘not to waste time’, but cutting these meetings short means that the team does not fully understand the full user stories, meaning its not likely they are going to be delivered as expected.

6 — Teams are in Silos

All the teams are working in silos, with painful handovers and dependancies, meaning user stories are often waiting on other teams before they can be completed.

7 — Teams want Information Refrigerators

The teams want information refrigerators because they are more safe, rather than information radiators which increate transparency.

How to Fix It?

The list above is a small list of indicators that Scrum in your company, but there are many many more. These are unfortunately quite common, and a result of company culture that lacks vision, a spark to want to change or is uncomfortable with challenging the status quo.

Scrum can become stale, if its not done properly, micro-managed or used for the wrong reasons. If you only ever focus on what you are doing, and do not look on the outside for inspiration then your company will struggle to find that sweet spot and deliver as an Agile organisation.

If at this point, you have come to the realisation that this is the point at where you are at, then you may need to bring in some outside help. Its probably the spark you need.

By allowing employees to attend outside events, or getting in an Agile Coach is a great way to get things moving again.

The benefits of this are that an outside coach is impartial to your company, meaning they are not invested in the outcome of your company or has any bias, giving them an advantage to focus on the process. They also bring a vast amount of experience and knowledge. A coach will have worked with many different companies, tried many different techniques and worked with many different types of company. This might be the spark that is needed to get your company going, bring a new fresh way of thinking and help you to iron out those issues you have from applying scrum correctly.

This post was originally posted on: theproducthub.io
https://www.theproducthub.io/2021/01/03/failing-at-scrum/
Please check my site to get the latest articles first!

About the Author

Ashley-Christian Hardy
theproducthub.io

Product Leader. Over 10 years in product development; with experience in product management, UX & UI, product design, product & delivery methodologies and product leadership. A strong advocate in innovation, experimentation and building great products with the use of qualitative and quantitative research, putting an emphasis on a customer centric design and approach.

Website: www.theproducthub.io

Twitter: www.twitter.com/achardypm

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theproducthubio

LinkedIn: mt.linkedin.com/in/achardypm

Medium: medium.com/@achardypm

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theproducthub.io/

Pinterest: pinterest.com/achardypm

SlideShare: slideshare.net/ashlychrstn

Product leader. A strong advocate in innovation, experimentation and building great products with the use of qualitative and quantitative research.